Rating calculations
Here's an explanation of how our rating system works.
The rating scale goes from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest).
MP Candidate rating questionnaire
My highest level of education:
* Not included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Ph. D. or higher
- [ 4 ] University degree
- [ 3 ] College degree
- [ 2 ] High school
- [ 1 ] Elementary school, less or no school
Who am I to question these authorities?:
* Not included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Expert in political science
- [ 4 ] One of the elite
- [ 3 ] Average Joe
- [ 2 ] Spouse, family member, neighbor, other related party
- [ 1 ] Other
Do you think you would be a better MP than this person?: Do you think you would be a better representative?
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] No, he/she is a proven expert
- [ 4 ] No, but I could try
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Most likely with the adequate training
- [ 1 ] Yes, when can I start?
Would you vote for this person?: Would you support this person in the next elections?
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Yes, with a generous donation
- [ 4 ] Most likely
- [ 3 ] I don't think so
- [ 2 ] Never
- [ 1 ] I will always support his opponent no matter who that is
Do you think that the work of this person is useful for the community?: Rate if work done by this person is useful for the community?
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Very useful
- [ 4 ] I am not sure
- [ 3 ] Not useful
- [ 2 ] Useless
- [ 1 ] Contra-productive
Rate the ability of this person to deliver results.: Ability of this person to deliver results
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Always gives the best/most efficient results
- [ 4 ] There are results, but not always in time/efficient
- [ 3 ] I am not familiar with his/her work
- [ 2 ] There are some results
- [ 1 ] No results
Do you think this is the right person to represent taxpayers?: Do you think this is the right person for the job?
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Yes, it would be hard to find someone better
- [ 4 ] Yes
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] No, he/she should be replaced
- [ 1 ] No, even a monkey would do it better
Can the public trust this person?: Can the public trust this person?
* Included in the calculation of the overall rating
- [ 5 ] Always
- [ 4 ] Sometimes
- [ 3 ] Not sure
- [ 2 ] Rarely
- [ 1 ] Never
Rating scheme
We use the following scheme to convert the number scale into descriptive ratings:
4.75 – 5.00
Superior
4.25 – 4.75
Excellent
3.75 – 4.25
Very good
3.25 – 3.75
Good
2.75 – 3.25
Not bad
2.25 – 2.75
Questionable
1.75 – 2.25
Very bad
1.25 – 1.75
Extremely bad
0.00
Not rated yet
All data on this website is collected from public sources.
Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.